Google Maps vs HERE WeGo: The Best Offline Navigation App

Gone are the days of Personal Navigation Devices or PND’s.

Today we have the almighty smartphone to do a activity of 100 instruments in one device and seamless navigation is one of them.
Out of the many offline navigation apps handy on the market, Google Maps and HERE WeGo from Nokia are two of the very easiest options accessible.

But, which one out of those two is the easiest, we will are attempting to discover out in this post.
For this, we have established either these apps employing an Android telephone and have verified their online as smartly as offline facets and we will aid you come to a decision which app you should have on your telephone.Download HERE WeGoDownload Google Maps1.

PriceEarlier Nokia’s HERE WeGo (Formerly HERE Maps) used to be an exclusive feature of Nokia devices and its availability became also somewhat limited. It converted into only after a considerable quantity of time the agency determined to make it public along with all its features and these days Android users can enjoy the advantages of it on their phones, free of cost.

Google, on the other hand, has always been accessible across various platforms. Although the availability of facets has multiple drastically, however, for Android, Google Maps has been the best solution providing all its elements and that too for unfastened.Therefore, when it comes to deciding the best app based on its price, either those apps are right there at the top. They be offering their services free of charge and that includes offline navigation as well.HERE WeGo: 1 Google Maps: 12.

Offline AvailabilityAs we have already touched upon the topic of offline navigation in the final element, here we will talk about it in a little more certain manner.Since my Nokia days (Symbian OS) at the similar time as the gadgets were no longer as speedy as we see nowadays, HERE has been my go-to solution for offline navigation. There are several reasons for me to choose that, however, the main explanation why for me to decide on this was that there became no decrease as to how long I can preserve the offline reproduction of the maps for a specific area on my tool.

However, one arena in which Here WeGo falls quick of Google Maps is with the capability to customize the offline maps. We will communicate about it in the following aspects.

For now, let’s circulation ahead and communicate about Google Maps.Google has made its Maps app truly dazzling and it also comes as a default/pre-loaded app for Android phones. However, whilst it comes to Offline navigation, Google does a great job overall, nonetheless at times it will marvel you with an odd-ball thrown at you at the worst feasible time. I personally love the fact that you can choose the arena you desire to store or make handy for offline use, however, the time reduce or the assertion that offline maps come with an expiry date is basically a massive turn-off.But in the end, either apps have good, if no longer identical offline facets and they compete neck-to-neck with both other.HERE WeGo: 2 Google Maps: 23.

App Installation SizeWell, do now not get fooled by means of the program length that is mentioned on the Play Store, in reality, those apps consume way lot memory on your telephone that what the program size basically is. I installed both these apps on my phone to check out how plenty storage they actually end up ingesting in particular when there are no offline maps kept on the phone.

To make it an certainly fair comparison, either apps were installed from scratch and have been used for a span of 15 days and post that usage those reading have been captured.
Not to be stunned on the other hand Google Maps consume just about double the storage area as consumed through HERE WeGo.Google Maps app installed on my phone jogging Android Oreo consumes a total of 395MB of area.

This contains app installation, User files and the Cache.HERE WeGo on the other hand on my telephone jogging Android Oreo consumes a whole of 190MB of space.

This contains app installation, User assistance and the Cache.Overall, a 200MB storage area might now not be much for devices with 64GB storage or more, however, there are users who have a modest 4GB or 8GB of garage, for them this difference may just mean a lot. Therefore, in this regard, HERE WeGo get a mild knowledge over Google Maps.HERE WeGo: 3 Google Maps: 24.

Offline Map CustomizationOne of the best negative aspects of Google Maps is also a giant knowledge for it. Remember we talked about how Google Maps enables you to keep customized offline maps on your tool.While saving offline maps with Google, the app asks you for the arena you desire to shop on your phone.

While on the other hand, HERE WeGo has latest places to download for offline usage.
It may appearance like a small feature, but it is actually a huge capabilities for Google Maps. Users can choose the arena they wish to store for offline use and in turn, it helps keep a ample quantity of resources, be it in terms of archives or even the garage area on your telephone.All you want to do is move to offline maps and choose the area which you wish to keep for offline use. It could be as small as 20 Kilometre square. Making it a clear winner in this round.HERE WeGo: 3 Google Maps: 35.

Traffic UpdatesBoth apps have a lot of users and therefore they have some fairly top traffic approximations to be offering.

However, Google has a larger traffic algorithm as compared to HERE.Google Maps can certainly exhibit you the density of traffic on any given street down to very heavy traffic, denoted via a stark red colour.

However, Here Maps has simply very classic suggestions whilst it comes to color usage and heavy traffic is denoted by red, mild by yellow and easy-going traffic is denoted by green.This deeper color gradation truly makes a big affect and is a very beneficial feature for the user.HERE WeGo: 3 Google Maps: 46.

Active ReroutingThis is an alternative very interesting feature that is a must-have for any navigation app. Active rerouting permits the app to modify or modify the assigned path in among the journey whilst the app detects that there is a congestion on the way.Sadly, HERE WeGo misses out on this feature despite being ready to computer screen are living traffic updates. Google, on the other hand, wins this one because it estimates the course primarily based on the shortest time. Although, there have been cases in which I’ve been stranded on a faraway path, all thank you to Google, nevertheless, that’s for another time.
Google Maps have a very interesting and precise rerouting set of rules, if there is a congestion on the way, Google will first of all are trying to stay away from that completely, however, if in case the situation has changed whilst you are on the manner, it will alert you for that and suggest an option path.Partially I charge that this is because Google owns Waze and it has a large network of active users who keep alerting fellow passengers about road dangers and conditions.HERE WeGo: 3 Google Maps: 57.

Third-party App IntegrationLast nevertheless no longer the least, Google Maps is basically everywhere, and it has a very wealthy third-party app or amenities integration. While on the other hand, HERE WeGo is relatively new to this game and has a long manner to cross previously it reaches the related aspect at which Google Maps stand nowadays.

HERE WeGo: 3 Google Maps: 6Google All the WayIt is precise that Google is a big company and has a large base of developers plus the fan network helping them improve their products. However, being a long time HERE Maps user, I can say that they have also come a long manner from in which they were before.Today you have access to indoor maps, 3D mapping, reside updates and so on. All this aspects in simply one direction and that says that HERE is also moving in the correct direction. Maybe, it is not as effectual as Google Maps is these days, but 10 years down the line, who knows it may be HERE all the manner.